INNOVATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Quick Search
All publication are peer-review
Peer review will take the from of double-blind review Judge objectively and impartially
There is no conflict of interest for the reviewer
Review articles shall be kept strictly confidential prior to publication
Regional Innovation
Regional Innovation Synergy Under the Expansion of the Interna⁃ tional Center for Science & Technology Innovation: A Sixdimensional Framework Based on Beijing-Tianjin
Wang Mengyao, Ma Huzhao, Wang Fang, Zhang Siyue
(Tianjin Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Tianjin 300011, China)
Abstract: The construction of the International Center for Science & Technology Innovation is a core carrier for implementing the innovation-driven development strategy and seizing the commanding heights of science and technology competition in the new era. Against the backdrop of its expansion, this paper examines the paradigm shift in its strategic logic, develops a sixdimensional framework, and diagnoses the Beijing-Tianjin dyad to propose countermeasures for strengthening its innovation synergy during the 15th Five-Year Plan period, offering theoretical support and policy references for regional innovation synergy in this context. ①Expansion is not merely geographical enlargement but embodies triple connotations consisting of spatial restructuring, functional extension, and governance upgrading. Spatial restructuring drives a transition from the growth pole paradigm to a network synergy paradigm. Functional extension requires the innovation chain to reach downstream pilot-scale testing, achievement transfer, and industrialization, forming a closed loop. Governance upgrading resolves the tension between rigid administrative boundaries and cross-regional factor mobility through institutional innovation, building a multi-agent governance network of government, market, and nodal organizations. Mutually reinforcing and progressively nested, these connotations jointly constitute the theoretical premise of regional innovation synergy under expansion. ②Regional innovation synergy comprises six core elements, namely relative comparative advantages, regional development consensus, dual-drive governance, key node synergy, science and technology achievement transfer, and precision integration of innovation and industrial chains. A correlation matrix maps their correspondences to the triple connotations, further forming a six-dimensional framework. Mechanistically, the first three form an orientation layer providing direction, rules, and institutional guarantees, while the latter three form an operational layer offering concrete levers and carriers. The framework establishes a continuous interactive loop of orientation guidance, operational implementation, practical feedback, and orientation optimization, offering an actionable diagnostic instrument for regional innovation synergy under expansion. ③A diagnosis of the Beijing-Tianjin dyad reveals shortcomings across all three dimensions. Four suggestions are proposed. First, strengthen regional top-level design, leverage comparative advantages, consolidate development consensus, and advance coordinated legislation and central-local coordination. Second, enhance innovation corridor connectivity, refine node functional division, and establish regular linkage and benefitsharing regimes. Third, improve the regional innovation system, promote achievement transfer and dual-chain integration, launch joint regional research programs, and upgrade cross-regional services of industrial public technology platforms. Fourth, build a collaborative governance system, uphold dual-drive governance, and refine benefit-sharing, mutual qualification recognition, and multi-agent co-governance mechanisms.
Key words: International Center for Science & Technology Innovation; regional innovation; collaborative governance; the Beijing-Tianjin dyad; six-dimensional framework; new-quality productivity; science and technology innovation; transformation of scientific and technological achievements